I'm surprised and somewhat disappointed that this article was rated so poorly by its readers. Why was it rated so poorly? I thought it detailled very well many aspects of drow society and life, and also played with the common interpretation of drow, making them so irredemably perverted and evil-and proud of it-that it effectively nipped in the bud any possibility of a Greyhawk Drizzt Do'Urden or Eilistraee.
So, what were your thoughts on the article? _________________ <div align="left">Going to war without Keoland is like going to war without a pipe organ. They both make a lot of noise and they're both a lot of dead weight, so what's the point in taking them along? </div>
Personally, I enjoyed the article too. I suspect that most readers rated it poorly perhaps because they wanted to see a more practical side of the Drow. Exactly when do they come out, if ever? Who are their enemies and exactly to what extent does the the war, if any, extend between the Drow and the races above ground? Maybe folks wanted more of a taste with religion? Maybe folks just wanted more detail? I apologize for the pedestrian musings, but it's a stab.
I ain't skeerd of no dirty elves,
Dwarf from Nyrond (looking over his shoulder)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Canonfire! is a production of the Thursday Group in assocation with GREYtalk and Canonfire! Enterprises
