Username Password
   or Create an Account
HomeForumsFAQArticlesReviewsDownloadsLinksTop 20Feedback
 Features
 
Greyhawk Wiki

 
Canonfire :: View topic - Greyhawk no longer Core D&D world!
Greyhawk no longer Core D&D world!
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Canonfire Forum Index -> Greyhawk- D&D 4th Edition
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mortellan
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator


Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Posts: 2562
Location: Ullinois

PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:17 pm    Post subject: Greyhawk no longer Core D&D world! Reply with quote

http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=204357

From the Wizards R&D seminar, posted by an attendee.

"Greyhawk will not be default setting in core
We want to leverage the assets of the assumed parts of a D&D world Mordenkainen, Bigby, Vecna, Llolth, Tiamat, Asmodeus, etc. However, we also want to call upon the great mythology that is more commonly known such as Thor, etc."


also ominous:

"Living Greyhawk will be coming to a triumphant close next year, and they will be starting fresh with a new batch of characters and players. This will be discussed tonight or tomorrow"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
weaver95
Journeyman Greytalker


Joined: Jun 16, 2007
Posts: 56

PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:24 pm    Post subject: Re: Greyhawk no longer Core D&D world! Reply with quote

mortellan wrote:
http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=204357

From the Wizards R&D seminar, posted by an attendee.

"Greyhawk will not be default setting in core
We want to leverage the assets of the assumed parts of a D&D world Mordenkainen, Bigby, Vecna, Llolth, Tiamat, Asmodeus, etc. However, we also want to call upon the great mythology that is more commonly known such as Thor, etc."


also ominous:

"Living Greyhawk will be coming to a triumphant close next year, and they will be starting fresh with a new batch of characters and players. This will be discussed tonight or tomorrow"


Not surprising. LG has never been popular with WoTC.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mortellan
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator


Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Posts: 2562
Location: Ullinois

PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agh I need to be flogged. One of the mods needs to put this thread in the 4E sticky thread above. Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bubbagump
Master Greytalker


Joined: Jun 25, 2007
Posts: 951
Location: Neck Deep in the Viscounty of Verbobonc

PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya know, it occurs to me that this might be a good thing. If WotC is leaving Greyhawk alone, then they can't screw it up anymore. And if they "leverage the assets" to the right company, there might be some good stuff ahead. Then again, if they leverage it to the wrong people, then Greyhawk is screwed.

I just have to wonder if there's anything to the rumors that Paizo might be picking up the Greyhawk license...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DavidBedlam
Journeyman Greytalker


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 161
Location: Yorkshire, Britain

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paizo run Greyhawk? I can live with that. The GH they've been doing with stuff like Core Beliefs and Demonomicon of Iggwilv has been generally good.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EileenProphetofIstus
Master Greytalker


Joined: Jun 28, 2007
Posts: 725
Location: Montevideo, Minnesota, US

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bubbagump:
Where did you hear about rumors of WOTC picking up Greyhawk? If you indeed heard/read something like that I too would like to read it.
_________________
Eileen of Greyhawk, Prophet of Istus, Messenger of the Gods
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Phantasm72
Apprentice Greytalker


Joined: Dec 01, 2006
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Personally I wouldnt mind at all if Greyhawk is dropped from the 'core rules' and LG dries up.
Im an avid Greyhawk fan. You dont need much more then the '83 boxed set. I much rather see new material from its die-hard fans then 'triads' attempting to push something out because they are obligated too....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bubbagump
Master Greytalker


Joined: Jun 25, 2007
Posts: 951
Location: Neck Deep in the Viscounty of Verbobonc

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eileen:

Rumors - mostly wishful thinking, I suspect - started floating around several chatrooms I frequent at almost the same time rumors of 4e started floating around.

I'm pretty sure all those rumors were complete speculation. However, in hindsight I now realize that certain WotC people I've chatted with over the last year or two have (probably subconsciously) dropped hints about 4e, so I wonder if there might be a grain of truth behind certain GH comments I've picked up in other chats.

Just for clarification and to avoid getting anyone's hopes up - I have read absolutely nothing that provides any positive indication that Paizo will pick up GH. I'm merely speculating about certain comments overheard in chatrooms.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EileenProphetofIstus
Master Greytalker


Joined: Jun 28, 2007
Posts: 725
Location: Montevideo, Minnesota, US

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bubbagump:

Thanks for gettingback to me on this, I appreciate it. As always, we will always try and remain optimistic about Greyhawk's future. Let me know if anything else surfaces.
_________________
Eileen of Greyhawk, Prophet of Istus, Messenger of the Gods
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
CruelSummerLord
Adept Greytalker


Joined: Apr 26, 2002
Posts: 370
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bubbagump wrote:
Ya know, it occurs to me that this might be a good thing. If WotC is leaving Greyhawk alone, then they can't screw it up anymore. And if they "leverage the assets" to the right company, there might be some good stuff ahead. Then again, if they leverage it to the wrong people, then Greyhawk is screwed.

I just have to wonder if there's anything to the rumors that Paizo might be picking up the Greyhawk license...


I agree. This way, there are no more alien invasions, no more Tenh being turned into an ash wasteland, no more radical roller-coaster changes, nothing like that.

Who knows, maybe someone like Paizo would even hit the Reset button, rewind the timeline to 576 CY, and go back to the glory days of giving DMs the tools to let them craft their own campaigns, instead of taking the FR way of dictating changes externally through canon.

That would be so, so, so sweet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mortellan
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator


Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Posts: 2562
Location: Ullinois

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That may very well be what will happen to Living Greyhawk. It's been announced they will end their campaign in a year and start over. The details of the starting over are still murky though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vormaerin
Master Greytalker


Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Posts: 666

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've no idea if WotC will resume licensing its IP. It seems to have recalled all of it over the last year or so, which may be a deliberate policy change or just something they felt they should do prior to 4e. If they do reissue the licenses and include GH in that for the first time, Eric Mona has made it quite clear that he wants that license. That is no indication of whether WotC will actually issue the license, however.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
iquander
Journeyman Greytalker


Joined: Jun 29, 2001
Posts: 78
Location: Renton, WA

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've asked repeatedly and recently. WotC is not currently interested in licensing out Greyhawk or any other setting to another company.

They _do_ seem to be interested in supporting online Wiki-like support of all of their settings as part of their "digital initiative."

Of course, Wikipedia itself has a fairly robust set of Greyhawk offerings available for free, so YMMV.

--Erik
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GreyHack
Apprentice Greytalker


Joined: Feb 11, 2004
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And it's official, Living Greyhawk is ending.

The campaign will wrap at Origins, and be replaced by Living Forgotten Realms at GenCon.

http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=908402
_________________
Rich,
Deputy Site Admin Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
smillan_31
Grandmaster Greytalker


Joined: Nov 07, 2004
Posts: 1825
Location: Mt. Smolderac

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iquander wrote:
They _do_ seem to be interested in supporting online Wiki-like support of all of their settings as part of their "digital initiative."

Of course, Wikipedia itself has a fairly robust set of Greyhawk offerings available for free, so YMMV.

--Erik


Hey, and don't forget that Rob "Robbastard" Vest is pretty much single-handedly giving Greyhawk its own wiki --

http://www.canonfire.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bubbagump
Master Greytalker


Joined: Jun 25, 2007
Posts: 951
Location: Neck Deep in the Viscounty of Verbobonc

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Geez. Screw WotC's wiki idea. I'll gladly write for free to support CF or any other community whose faithfulness to GH I can count on. I have no problem supporting OJ, for example, or Rob Vest's wiki.

Not that I think my designs are all that great, but under no circumstances am I going to put any effort into building up WotC's database just so they can steal my ideas someday in the future when they finally decide to appease the GH-loving masses by putting out another book.

If they want any GH stuff from me, they can bloody well pay me for it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mortellan
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator


Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Posts: 2562
Location: Ullinois

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Living Forgotten Realms! That's even worse than I had imagined for the LG folks. Man...I -knew- when that WotC release said 'new players' it meant new players not a reboot. GH is now officially done for Wizards. Unreal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lassiviren
Journeyman Greytalker


Joined: Jan 18, 2006
Posts: 101

PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 5:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You know it must have been killing them to have such a huge player base without any crossover setting books to sell to them.

To be honest I am surprised they didn't try to kill it sooner.

The problem that they are going to run into is that having tons of players in your campaign setting doesn't always equal lots of setting book sales. It's the DM that buys these books, and I don't think the RPGA has that many DM's who are so devoted that they will jump out and purchase brand new 4.0 setting books.

I am glad that WotC seems to be taking a hands off approach with Greyhawk. I will be happy with the occasional "Return to" style of adventure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
GVDammerung
Grandmaster Greytalker


Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Posts: 1446

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

At one of the 4e seminars I attended at Gencon, it was explicitly confirmed by Bill Slavisek and Rich Baker - GH will not be the default in 4E. There will be no 4e default.

What there will be is a set of deities presented in the 4e PH to give examples for clerics. This list of deities will include some GH notables but will be mostly made up of figures from Greek and Norse mythology.

Other than these mentions, the only other GH mentions in 4e will be the occasional GH notable who is tied into the D&D melieu. So, Mordy and Tenser in the spell names. Vecna because he has grown beyond GH and has appeared in Planescape and Ravenloft and has major artifacts named after him. Etc.

It is safe to say GH is finally to be free of the default. And I for one welcome this with great enthusiasm. Happy
_________________
GVD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
OleOneEye
Journeyman Greytalker


Joined: Sep 20, 2005
Posts: 158
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas

PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GVDammerung wrote:
It is safe to say GH is finally to be free of the default. And I for one welcome this with great enthusiasm. Happy


Hear, hear. I still cannot accept Hieroneous with a longsword.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alaric_Prympax
Novice
Novice


Joined: Aug 11, 2001
Posts: 3
Location: Abbeville, La

PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OleOneEye wrote:
Hear, hear. I still cannot accept Hieroneous with a longsword.


Me too. That's why when I created the Glory Warrior PrC (and 'published' here on CF) I included the Battle Axe.

Hieroneous with a longsword my... Mad
_________________
Wait... What did I just post?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Robbastard
Adept Greytalker


Joined: Aug 13, 2001
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iquander wrote:
They _do_ seem to be interested in supporting online Wiki-like support of all of their settings as part of their "digital initiative."

Of course, Wikipedia itself has a fairly robust set of Greyhawk offerings available for free, so YMMV.

--Erik


True, but that material is never safe from deletion, due to a number of Wikipedia editors who don't consider it "notable."

Which is the main reason we now have a GH wiki on Canonfire!

It currently has only 70-something pages, but I hope to eventually transfer all the GH material from Wikipedia: http://www.canonfire.com/wiki/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Robbastard
Adept Greytalker


Joined: Aug 13, 2001
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

smillan_31 wrote:
iquander wrote:
They _do_ seem to be interested in supporting online Wiki-like support of all of their settings as part of their "digital initiative."

Of course, Wikipedia itself has a fairly robust set of Greyhawk offerings available for free, so YMMV.

--Erik


Hey, and don't forget that Rob "Robbastard" Vest is pretty much single-handedly giving Greyhawk its own wiki --

http://www.canonfire.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page


Oops! I need to read further down the thread before posting--thanks for the support, fellas.

Of course, this project would likely never happen were it not for GLH & Theocrat giving it a home.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Qstor
Journeyman Greytalker


Joined: Sep 24, 2001
Posts: 86
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

theres now a Greyhawk 4e WOTC messageboard so maybe that means that Greyhawk will get a hardback campaign sourcebook.

Yeah!

Mike
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
bubbagump
Master Greytalker


Joined: Jun 25, 2007
Posts: 951
Location: Neck Deep in the Viscounty of Verbobonc

PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Geez, I hope not! At least not until 5e or later. Still, I guess everyone needs a dream...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Canonfire Forum Index -> Greyhawk- D&D 4th Edition All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Canonfire phpBB2 theme by Jakob Persson (http://www.eddingschronicles.com).
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Stone textures by Patty Herford
Ported for PHP-Nuke by nukemods.com
Forums ©


Canonfire! is a production of the Thursday Group in assocation with GREYtalk and Canonfire! Enterprises

Contact the Webmaster.  Long Live Spidasa!

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.34 Seconds