Username Password
   or Create an Account
HomeForumsFAQArticlesReviewsDownloadsLinksTop 20Feedback
 Features
 
Greyhawk Wiki

 
Canonfire :: View topic - Tharizdun and 4E
Tharizdun and 4E
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Canonfire Forum Index -> Greyhawk- D&D 4th Edition
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
EileenProphetofIstus
Master Greytalker


Joined: Jun 28, 2007
Posts: 725
Location: Montevideo, Minnesota, US

PostPosted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tharizdun will be sorely missed.

Oh wait, he's imprisoned in my world.

Wait a minute, if he is imprisoned and nobody has let him out, then how in the world did he get a new job description with WOTC.

If WOTC let him out then they really need to have their alignment checked. Maybe it's time for an atonement spell. Happy
_________________
Eileen of Greyhawk, Prophet of Istus, Messenger of the Gods
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Vormaerin
Master Greytalker


Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Posts: 666

PostPosted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, as Rasgon pointed out in another thread, the fact that we can, do and will continue to change things as we see fit is pretty irrelevant to the discussion. After all, every discussion is ended by that point if you accept it as valid for the discussion. I don't use the cosmology as written now and I tend to make up my own monsters, adventures, etc. So in that sense, none of this is relevant to me.

But I still think the approach they are taking with this design is fundamentally flawed.. or, at least, at odds with the more expansive view I recall from "the olden days". And I particularly don't like how they are changing the baseline of discussion such that 4e folks aren't going to be talking the same language as 1-3e folks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cebrion
Black Hand of Oblivion
Black Hand of Oblivion


Joined: Feb 16, 2003
Posts: 3723
Location: So. Cal

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Things might turn out better than what the previews offer. It remains to be seen if 4e = Dee dee dee.
_________________
- Moderator/Admin (in some areas)/Member -
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gravenhurst
Apprentice Greytalker


Joined: Apr 02, 2008
Posts: 27
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DavidBedlam wrote:
Look on the bright side:

When 4.0 hits the shelves, your copies of the 1983 boxed set will not burst into flame and be destroyed. And given that, I must assume that Greyhawk must be safe.

I'm still on the fence on whether or not to jump on the 4.0 bandwagon, but if I do I see no reason why I can't use it for proper Greyhawk stuff.


WotC is not offering a 3.5E conversion tool. So all your 3.5E material will have to be updated by you, to 4thE. If you have the time or create your own material then it isn't a biggie to changing over to 4thE, but remember that it is like changing from 2ndE to 3.0E. Very different.

For example, if a dragon is a major villain in your story plot and you carry him over to 4th but keep the rest 3.5, things are going to get nasty around your gaming table when your hard earned PCs die in the first encounter! Because the new edition isn't holding any punches! Be prepared to buy everything new!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Galencudin
Apprentice Greytalker


Joined: Oct 17, 2007
Posts: 30
Location: 2nd pyramid

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi All.

I know I am very late on this post but I think the main thing is not really discussed here... In one way or another, we all have our House Rules, regardless of which edition we are playing with.
The future of GreyHawk does notdepend on the set of rules but rather on the campagn setting manual published with each (new) set of rules.
GreyHawk has a long history through many modules and campaign setting.
WotC publishes a 4th edition ? Well that is not really important. What is important is in publishing a campaign setting with the new set, it also describes the course of on going eventssince the last set of rules and also allow to expand forward the timeline. Since GreyHawk is based on lands, kingdoms and history (IMO) rather than on important figures (like the Forgotten Realms), a new edition is a good or bad thing in itslef. What is bad is to not support the historical campaign setting and dump it to the oubliette.
I think it is always written in the DM's guide that "if you do not like one or more rules, just drop them." or something like that.
So, we do not like the 4th edition rules (I do REALLY not), well forget it but make me a decent setting so I can play with an "official" timeline (and my old editions' rules and House Rules).

Thanks.
_________________
What does not kill us, makes us stronger. Friedrich Nietzsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blakeryan
Apprentice Greytalker


Joined: Apr 22, 2009
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In 4th edition Tharizdun is imprisioned and has been for a long time.

Only the gods know where he is and he sends messages to his followers to gain power and escape.

This seems like the original concept of Tharizdun to me.

Gary Gygax wrote in Artifact of Evil page 47, 'Aeons ago, he was trapped by those deities who understood that this greatest Evil must be fettered or all Goodness would perish from this world and possibly the entire multiverse.'

As for Demons and Devils, each intelligent creature group will have strong, charismatic or intelligent members. Also the Demons and Devils speel in the core books is a guide. Maybe the particular fiends dealing with Oerth over the centuries have picked up a few tricks from their mortal minions.

There is nothing to stop you having the Bloodwar in forth edition. Various Devil Lords and Demon Princes can send their minions after items, secrets and even staging grounds for invasions. Most devils will do it for gain, most demons may do it for the thrill of destruction, but again they will have leaders with their own motivations.

End of the day characters learn about fiends from npcs, just because that NPC is knowledgable does not mean the information is not tainted or simply wrong.

The worlds are your oyster, create what stories you will.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PaulN6
Master Greytalker


Joined: Dec 07, 2003
Posts: 636

PostPosted: Thu May 07, 2009 3:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well Tharizdun is the epitomy of the Far Realm isn't he? I had him as an enitity of that realm that found his way into our 'reality' due to the ancient Eladrin's use of the Vast Gate within Firestorm Peak (converted to White Plume Mountain). The gods saw the threat and made their pact to imprison him. Our ongoing campaign has elements of the Artifact of Evil, Return to the ToEE, Age of Worms, and Living Greyhawk plots, including one involving a cabal of cambions planning to use Hunger to destroy Iuz.

Any whisper of the Big T's release should be kept for Epic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Dark_Lord_Galen
Paladin
Paladin


Joined: Sep 07, 2011
Posts: 827
Location: Houston Texas

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Terjon"]
EileenProphetofIstus wrote:
I'm trying very hard not to lapse into my curmudgeonly old man persona, but every time I see stuff like this, it takes a lot of mental strength to contain myself. It's as if no one at WotC R&D either knows or cares about the 30+ years of history attached to some of these names and concepts. To them, they're just convenient monikers they can swipe for their own creations, the past be damned.

Such a shame -- and such a lost opportunity.


Said perfectly.....and the reason I departed from buying their offerings.
Now on my return (after 10 year sabbatical) the only course I see is how to incorporate their "offerings" back into something external and usable.
This my collegues is the challenge at hand .. if we have the strength to undertake it.
Further, Maldin's Grand Unified Theory of Life, the Multiverse and Everything presents a wonderful unique perspective on Tharizdun to build from. Read it here some where, not sure what thread ...certain a search would find it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Saracenus
Adept Greytalker


Joined: Nov 28, 2006
Posts: 336
Location: Barony of Trellwood, The Great Kingdom

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Someone necro-ed this thread to life? Ugh, let it die again.

Big T was left vague until 3e when he was brought into the story of the game. Most folks had their own ideas of who and what Tharizdun was.

4e D&D has fixed The Chained God into the creation story of core assumptions of D&D.

It is actually pretty cool to be honest. It might not be your story. It certainly isn't E. Gary Gygax's story (then again anything beyond The Forgotten Temple of Tharizdun and the original '83 Box Set isn't really Gary's version either). But it is one story out there.

Who cares if WotC uses Tharizdun in 4e? Everyone's game is their own, WotC isn't going to come to your house and rip up your campaign notes or send canonfire.com a C&D letter because there are varying views on him.

Every edition of D&D reshapes what has come before. Monsters that originally appeared in the Forgotten Realms have appeared in Greyhawk. Many monsters that had their start in Greyhawk have been found elsewhere.

The idea that any campaign world is some how pure and lessened by any change is frankly a mystery to me. Almost everyone here has their own version of Greyhawk. None are more valid than another. We have folks on this forum playing it with RuneQuest for Pete's sake.

If 4e isn't your cup of tea, go find a version that is and find your happy place.

I don't go to other edition forum post how their version of Greyhawk sucks, how about folks start showing the same courtesy here. If you got a beef with WotC go to their forums and vent there among the gibbering flametards that populate their forums.

In short leave this forum to those that enjoy this edition and want to do something constructive.

/RANT

Bryan Blumklotz
AKA Saracenus
Sun King of Arms, Herald of the Great Kingdom
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PaulN6
Master Greytalker


Joined: Dec 07, 2003
Posts: 636

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nerull is also alive and slaying in my campaign.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DeanP
Journeyman Greytalker


Joined: May 24, 2011
Posts: 55

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is or at least was a Blood War in Fourth Edition.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mystic-Scholar
GreySage


Joined: Oct 06, 2008
Posts: 2780
Location: South-Central Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Everyone has their thoughts and opinions on this matter and each and everyone one of us is entitled to ours.

Me? I like Tharizdun and use him. He's alive and well in my game, no matter what any edition says about him.

He's simply imprisoned by the other gods and is constantly "reaching out" to mortals in an effort to escape.

Simple as that.

Play Dread Tharizdun however you want and be tolerant of others. Happy

I use Nerull too. Wink Laughing

And a reminder: Anyone can resurrect any thread they wish too.

Mwahahahahahahaha!
_________________
Mystic's web page: http://melkot.com/mysticscholar/index.html
Mystic's blog page: http://mysticscholar.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Cebrion
Black Hand of Oblivion
Black Hand of Oblivion


Joined: Feb 16, 2003
Posts: 3723
Location: So. Cal

PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

While it is true that any thread can be resurrected, people ought to be aware of when the last post in any thread was made and reply to the thread accordingly, rather than as if the thread's conversion was continuing from just the previous day.

And I pity the fool who messes with Mr. T. Wink
_________________
- Moderator/Admin (in some areas)/Member -
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mystic-Scholar
GreySage


Joined: Oct 06, 2008
Posts: 2780
Location: South-Central Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for that reminder, Cebrion. Happy

I try to add that specific detail, but sometimes I forget. Embarassed

Thanks again! Cool
_________________
Mystic's web page: http://melkot.com/mysticscholar/index.html
Mystic's blog page: http://mysticscholar.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Canonfire Forum Index -> Greyhawk- D&D 4th Edition All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Canonfire phpBB2 theme by Jakob Persson (http://www.eddingschronicles.com).
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Stone textures by Patty Herford
Ported for PHP-Nuke by nukemods.com
Forums ©


Canonfire! is a production of the Thursday Group in assocation with GREYtalk and Canonfire! Enterprises

Contact the Webmaster.  Long Live Spidasa!

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.42 Seconds